Comments on: Ziegfeld Follies, 1920s

By: Mark

Mark — Sun, 21 Aug 2025 13:22:41 +0000

If you want to see real pornography from exactly those times. and before all they way back to sayyyyy…THE DAWN OF TIME! its not to hard to find. This is certainly NOT it.

]]>

By: Cat

Cat — Fri, 12 Aug 2025 21:40:41 +0000

zgirl:

pornography has been around since the dawn of time, and “erotic art” in ancient times was much more obscene than these photos. These photos are actual pieces of art and no where even near “early pornography”. If these photos were meant to be pornographic, boy would you know it.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

]]>

By: It really bulges

It really bulges — Fri, 12 Aug 2025 17:31:21 +0000

These are fantastic photo’s I love them all.

]]>

By: Robyn Jane

Robyn Jane — Fri, 05 Aug 2025 18:25:54 +0000

Not a bare nipple among them, and yet these pictures are incredibly erotic.

Sorry, zgirl. These are NOT pornography. They are fine examples of art. Art which features, by the way, women who are treated with respect and dignity.

If you want pornography, just look at the way the current US government–especially Congress–views and treats women. Now THAT is obscene!

]]>

By: zgirl

zgirl — Thu, 04 Aug 2025 19:18:21 +0000

Can someone explain to me why we should be nostalgic about these photos? I see them as early examples of pornography.

]]>

By: Nerdessence

Nerdessence — Thu, 04 Aug 2025 11:18:36 +0000

Ah, a time when women were still feminine and demure, with an edge of independence.

No plastic surgery needed. Bustlines were smaller and hips were pulled in for the defiantly flirtatious and stark garçonne look. Dramatic makeup and gorgeous fashion design abounded.

This is beauty. Not the modern day mannish beauty.

]]>